banner
槿呈Goidea

槿呈Goidea

读书|新知|生活禅
twitter
tg_channel
youtube

Bitwarden vs 1Password

TL;DR

Bitwarden1Password
FeaturesUsername and password generator
Password, secure notes, credit card, identity storage
Authenticator
Self-hosted
Email alias integration
Encrypted sending (Bitwarden sent)
Advanced 2FA
1GB organization storage attachments
Encrypted file attachments
Vault health report
Secure password generation, storage, and autofill
Password sharing
Password recovery
Authenticator
Watchtower
Travel mode
Dark web monitoring
Activity tracking
SecurityNever compromised
End-to-end encryption
Strong hashing algorithms
Multi-factor authentication
Data security audits
Open source
Never compromised
256-bit AES encryption
PBKDF2 password hashing
128-bit key
Security audits
Multi-factor authentication
CompatibilityWindows
macOS
Linux
iOS/iPadOS
Android
Chrome
Edge
Safari
Firefox
Opera
Vivaldi
Brave
Arc
Tor
Windows
macOS
Linux
iOS/iPadOS
Android
Chrome
Edge
FireFox
Safari
Opera
Arc
PriceFree: $0
Premium: $10/year
Family: $40/year
Teams Organization: $3/user/month
Enterprise Organization: $5/user/month
Free: Not available
Individual: $2.99/month
Family: $4.99/month
Teams: $19.95/month (10 users)
Business: $7.99/user/month

Security

Both Bitwarden and 1Password offer powerful security features expected in top password managers, including strong encryption, multi-factor authentication, and independent audits. Importantly, neither has suffered any security breaches, which sets them apart from other password managers.

Both utilize strong encryption algorithms, employing end-to-end 256-bit AES encryption, considered highly secure and virtually unbreakable. Due to the importance of protecting data, both operate in a "zero-knowledge" mode, meaning neither can access private user data internally.

Both also require a master password to access the password vault. 1Password uses an additional secret key as an extra layer of protection. Bitwarden, on the other hand, offers integration with third-party authentication apps like Google Authenticator and provides a built-in authenticator for premium accounts. In comparison, 1Password only supports various MFA options, including plugins for Authy and Microsoft Authenticator.

Both Bitwarden and 1Password undergo independent security audits to validate their security practices and ensure the integrity of their systems. These audits provide additional confidence in the security measures implemented by these services.

Additionally, Bitwarden is open-source, allowing the public to review its code, while 1Password's code cannot be externally inspected for vulnerabilities.

Features

As top password managers in the market, both Bitwarden and 1Password offer a range of shared features while also providing some unique functionalities.

In common, both provide simple and intuitive password storage, generation, and autofill capabilities for various online accounts. They offer browser extensions, mobile apps, and web-based interfaces to ensure easy access across different devices and platforms. Both password managers prioritize security by supporting various types of two-factor authentication and also offer secure password sharing options, allowing users to securely share passwords with trusted individuals.

The difference lies in 1Password's integrated watchtower feature, which evaluates password strength, identifies if passwords are used across multiple websites, and checks for any potential leaks. Bitwarden only provides limited support for this feature in its web version.

1Password also offers a travel mode feature, which is not available in Bitwarden.

Bitwarden Sent, on the other hand, is a powerful feature that allows users to securely share passwords, secure notes, and identity information with others, even if the recipients do not use Bitwarden. In Bitwarden Sent, users have control over the level of interaction with shared data, such as setting expiration dates and view limits.

Furthermore, Bitwarden provides flexibility for users by allowing them to input multiple Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) as passwords, enabling the use of the same login credentials across multiple websites. It also offers an option to re-prompt for the master password during automatic filling on specific sites.

Thanks to its open-source code, Bitwarden offers a self-hosted option, allowing users to deploy it through Docker.

Compatibility

Both Bitwarden and 1Password have strong system and browser compatibility, with the only difference being that Bitwarden also provides a web version, allowing users to access their password vault through a web interface.

1Password, however, excels in terms of user interaction.

Price

In terms of pricing, Bitwarden's advantage lies in its free version, which is sufficient for basic usage if features like Authenticator and 2FA are not needed. Its premium version is priced at only $10/year. On the other hand, 1Password does not offer a free version and has an annual price of $36. However, for team versions, 1Password's pricing is more affordable.

Loading...
Ownership of this post data is guaranteed by blockchain and smart contracts to the creator alone.